† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11874145).
The ultra-low thermal conductivity of roughened silicon nanowires (SiNWs) can not be explained by the classical phonon–surface scattering mechanism. Although there have been several efforts at developing theories of phonon–surface scattering to interpret it, but the underlying reason is still debatable. We consider that the bond order loss and correlative bond hardening on the surface of roughened SiNWs will deeply influence the thermal transport because of their ultra-high surface-to-volume ratio. By combining this mechanism with the phonon Boltzmann transport equation, we explicate that the suppression of high-frequency phonons results in the obvious reduction of thermal conductivity of roughened SiNWs. Moreover, we verify that the roughness amplitude has more remarkable influence on thermal conductivity of SiNWs than the roughness correlation length, and the surface-to-volume ratio is a nearly universal gauge for thermal conductivity of roughened SiNWs.
Understanding and tuning the thermal transport in nanostructures are very important for the development of thermoelectric devices[1–11] and the thermal management of micro- and nano-electronics devices.[12–24] Because of the high surface-to-volume ratio (SVR) of nanostructures, the phonon–surface scattering results in the prominent size effect limiting the thermal transport. However the precise effects of surface on thermal transport have remained unclear because the mechanism of phonon–surface scattering is still not well understood. In many literatures, the effect of phonon-boundary scattering has been treated by assuming a constant value p,[25–28] which is a fitting parameter to simulate the probability of specular scattering. Ziman’s formula[29] p = exp (–16π2δ2/λ2) is an improvement over the constant p model as it accounts for wavelength and surface roughness dependent scattering.[30–32] The thermal conductivities of silicon nanowires (SiNWs) calculated by Ziman’s theory[33,34] agree well with the measurement results of comparatively smooth SiNWs grown by the vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) method.[35] However, the measured thermal conductivities of rough SiNWs obtained by electrochemical etching (EE) are much lower than the Casimir limit corresponding to complete momentum randomization at the surface (p = 0).[36] Ziman’s theory fails to predict it, because further increase of surface roughness does not lead to appreciable reduction of thermal conductivity (κ) calculated by Ziman’s theory. Several efforts have been made toward an accurate understanding of phonon surface scattering. Moore et al. predicted stronger backscattering of phonons at periodically rough surfaces by phonon Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.[37] Based on the Born approximation, Martin et al. used a perturbative approach to get the roughness scattering mechanism.[38] Sadhu and Sinha, using a wave-like phonon transport approach, considered coherent scattering of phonons from a rough surface.[39] Although these theoretical studies accounted for the surprisingly suppression of SiNWs by very rough surfaces, they could not well explain the experimental work by Lim et al., which performed a systematic experimental study of the surface condition of intentionally roughened VLS-grown SiNWs and provided the first evidence for frequency-dependent phonon scattering from the rough surfaces.[40] By introducing the Beckmann–Kirchhoff based surface scattering theory, Malhotra and Maldovan calculated the wavelength heat spectrum and found that increased phonon surface scattering led to the shifts towards short phonon wavelengths and mean free paths.[41] However, by combining the Landauer model and spectral scaling model, Lee et al. revealed that the experimentally measured ballistic phonon transport in the holey silicon with small neck size (only 20 nm) stemmed form filtering high-frequency phonons and increasing contribution of low-frequency phonons by surface scattering.[42] These contradictions imply that the mechanism of phonon–surface scattering in nanostructures requires further exploration.
The traditional phonon–surface scattering mechanism only takes into account the geometric constraints of the surface resulting in the change of motion of particles or waves, which is the numerical boundary attribute of the surface. The surface of a nanostructure terminates the periodicity of the lattice, but it is not simply equal to the mathematical boundary. The physical attributes of atoms near the surface are different from those in the bulk, for example, the atoms in the surface skin are under-coordinated. The loss of bond order makes the bonds of the under-coordinated atoms become shorter and stronger.[43,44] The bond shortening and strengthening in the surface skin provide a perturbation to the Hamiltonian of the lattice vibration system, and this under-coordination effect should play an important role in the phonon transport of nanostructures because of the ultra-high surface-to-volume ratio of the nanostructures. However, in the traditional models of phonon–surface scattering, this coordination dependent mechanism is overlooked. Very recently, base on the bond order theory and quantum perturbation theory, we presented a novel phonon–surface scattering mechanism from the perspective of bond order loss.[45] In this work, we combine this mechanism with the phonon Boltzmann transport equation (BTE). The calculation results agree well with the ultra low κ of intentionally roughened VLS SiNWs in experiments. It is revealed that the surface bond order imperfections play the dominant role in hindering transport of high-frequency phonons, which results in the obvious reduction of κ. Furthermore, we numerically generate the random roughness profile of SiNWs according to the given autocorrelation function, and detailedly analyze the effect of the geometrical parameters on κ of the roughened SiNWs.
On the basis of phonon BTE, the κ of phonons of the λ-th branch in the direction of ∇T(x) of the nanowire is derived as[46]
Based on phonon BTE, the κ of SiNWs can be calculated as κ = κLA + 2κTA. In order to calculate κLA and κTA by Eq. (
The SVR of nanowires in Eq. (
In order to calculate the SVR of the roughened SiNWs by Eq. (
By the convolution theorem, the power spectrum density S(q) is the Fourier transform of the ACF given by
Figure
From Eq. (
Figure
Additionally, as demonstrated in Fig.
In order to further understand the sensitivity of the individual parameter on the κ of the roughened SiNWs with exponential or Gaussian surface, we get 50 samples according to the uniform distribution of parameters, D: 50–100 nm, δ: 1.0n–5.0n, ξ: 5.0–15.0 nm, calculate κ of the roughened SiNWs with these parameters, and plot the scatter diagram in Figs.
In our previous work, we found that the introduction of dense hole obviously increased the surface-to-volume ratio of two-dimensional phononic crystals and remarkably suppressed the thermal conductivity due to the mechanism of phonon–surface bond order imperfection scattering.[45] Combined with this work, we make clear the underlying physical mechanism why increasing the surface-to-volume ratio of nanostructures is an effective strategy of surface engineering for blocking heat conduction.
In summary, by combining the phonon–surface bond order imperfection scattering mechanism with phonon BTE, our investigation reproduced the ultra-low κ of intentionally roughened SiNWs, and revealed that the surface bond order imperfections played the dominant role in hindering transport of high-frequency phonons, therefore resulted in the remarkable reduction of κ. Additionally, the quantitative effects of parameters D, δ, ξ, and ACF of surface on thermal conductivity of roughened SiNWs have been detailedly studied. In particular, we found that the surface-to-volume ratio was nearly an universal gauge for thermal conductivity of roughened SiNWs. This work is helpful not only to understand the blocking of surface on thermal transport in nanostructures, but also to modulate the phonon transport by surface engineering.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] | |
[39] | |
[40] | |
[41] | |
[42] | |
[43] | |
[44] | |
[45] | |
[46] | |
[47] | |
[48] | |
[49] | |
[50] | |
[51] | |
[52] | |
[53] | |
[54] |